Your bill includes non-Kubernetes spend across multiple clouds and you want one ledger that rolls Kubernetes up alongside it.
Pod-level efficiency and idle-time analysis inside a single Kubernetes cluster is the main job.
Kubecost OSS is free; Enterprise is sales-priced via the IBM Cloudability lineup. Tovin.io publishes Free / $49 / $149 per month and is workload-agnostic.
Different cuts of the same problem
Kubecost answers 'what did each namespace, workload, or label cost inside this cluster?' Tovin.io answers 'what did each project cost across the whole bill — Droplets, RDS, Spaces, DOKS namespaces, and BigQuery?' The two often coexist: Kubecost for in-cluster detail, Tovin.io for the cross-cloud rollup.
Operational cost
Kubecost's total cost of ownership includes Helm and Prometheus operations across every cluster. Tovin.io externalizes that cost to provider billing exports — no in-cluster agent, no per-cluster maintenance.
Who tovin.io is for
Frequently asked
Is Tovin.io a Kubecost replacement?
For teams that need a unified bill across AWS, GCP, DigitalOcean, and Kubernetes namespaces, yes. For deep in-cluster pod-level efficiency, Kubecost is still the right tool, and the two can coexist.
Does Tovin.io need an in-cluster agent?
No. Tovin.io reads provider billing data. Kubecost installs into each cluster via Helm and depends on Prometheus.
Can Tovin.io allocate Kubernetes namespace cost?
Yes, through Kubernetes labels surfaced in provider billing plus regex rules on resource names.
What changed with the IBM/Apptio acquisition?
Kubecost's enterprise direction is now anchored inside the IBM Cloudability lineup. Tovin.io remains a standalone, self-serve product with a public price.